Going round in circles?
The Background to the issue
- It is difficult to track, quantify and assess the fast moving prices and costs of the arable margin
- Recent harvests have not been sufficient to maintain most arable
businesses in a viable position with many delaying machinery purchases
and living off their depreciation.
- The general lack of profitability has driven many to restructure
through contract farming agreements and more recently by setting up
labour and machinery syndicates.
Current progressive farm Structures
- A typical machinery syndicate will consist of
- 3,000 to 5,000 acres consisting of 4 businesses
- Machinery held in a Limited Liability Partnership
- Managed by the son of one of the businesses usually aged early thirties
- Value of machinery per acre around £120 to £150
- One combine backed up by a contractor if required
- Whole area block cropped
- Gross margin on all crops equalised between the businesses
- These syndicates have resulted in driving down the costs of
labour and machinery per acre from an average of £131 per acre and Top
25% of £118 per acre down to an average for syndicates of £96 per acre
for the 2007 harvest.
- These restructured businesses should now be well placed to
capitalise on the arable price increases however have these price
increases been exhumed by higher input costs?
- Wheat is 55% of the arable area in the Grant Thornton Top 25%
group therefore the impact of the wheat gross margin can be assessed.
- Input costs of seeds, fertilisers and chemicals on average increase by 58% from 2006 to the 2009 harvest.
- The wheat margin for the 2006 harvest for the Top 25% group was
£173 per acre (average was £141) and this increases to £286 per acre for
the 2009 harvest - an increase of 65%
- However fuel costs are likely to rise from £19 per acre to £39
per acre - an additional £20 per acre or 105% over the 3 year period.
Add to this an average 4% overall increase in fixed costs and the impact
on the Net Farm Income is an overall increase of £57% from 2006 to
2009.
- However it can be argued that the £134 is not a sustainable
figure to fund farmer drawings, tax, capital repayments on loans and
reinvestment. Therefore if the 2007 harvest Net Farm Income of £237 is
taken as a benchmark then the results are a reduction in profitability
from £237 per acre to £210 per acre - a reduction of 11%
- With increased costs eroding the higher prices the focus must
not be taken off streamlining businesses, maintaining a balance between
- cost reduction
- timeliness and efficiency
- The use of machinery must be flexible in modern farming businesses as areas may change from season to season
- High HP tractors used for short periods in the autumn may be better hired
- to remain flexible
- reduce capital tied up
- tax relief on rentals
- access to up to date models
Information and financial examples supplied by: